Tag: ipod


The iPod Turns 10 And Some People Never Learn

October 23rd, 2011 — 4:46pm

Arnold Kim:

Ten years ago today, Steve Jobs took the stage and introduced the first iPod.

Initial reaction to the iPod wasn’t entirely favorable. Slashdot’s famous reaction was “No wireless. Less space than a nomad. Lame.” MacRumors was also around at the time as well, and much of the reader reaction was also negative. One commenter wrote:

All that hype for an MP3 player? Break-thru digital device? The Reality Distiortion Field™ is starting to warp Steve’s mind if he thinks for one second that this thing is gonna take off.

Of course, ten years later, the iPod has sold over 304 million units.

Read through the 10 year old comment forum.  You could copy and paste the exact same reactions and comments after the iPhone announcement, the iPad announcement and most recently the iPhone 4S announcement.

You’d think after 10 years of getting it completely wrong they’d learn.

Comments Off | movies/tv, tech

This Is Why We Call You A Shill

May 31st, 2011 — 1:07pm

Paul Thurrott:

I’m a pretty heavy user of Twitter again, which certainly has its pros and cons. On the pro side, I get to interact with people who share the same love of technology as do I. On the con side, I get to interact with people who believe that the anonymity of the Internet lets them make callous and incorrect remarks about, well, me. Case in point: I was just offhandedly described as a “Microsoft shill,” along with noted Windows expert Ed Bott, another guy who’s spent his life helping others with technology.

The biggest difference between those who advocate non-Microsoft solutions and those who simply use Microsoft’s products and services is that the former are obsessed about their choice and the choices that other people make. On the PC side, we’re simply not obsessed about either. Obviously, we use PCs. And we understand that some other people do not. We’re just not interested in pushing our worldview on others. This sounds very general, and it is, but it’s also very true.

Here’s the same Paul Thurrott live-blogging the iPad announcement:

The thing I don’t get here is… So far, nothing new. This has all been done before elsewhere. I’m astonished this isn’t nicer looking or more interesting.

Jobs: “It’s so much more intimate than a laptop.” Yes, Steve. PC users have known that since 2002. Geesh.

This stuff is just boring. If Apple wanted this to be a game machine, they should have built hardware controls into that huge bezel.

And am I missing something or does this not do handwriting recognition? You know, like the Windows Tablet PC software has since 2002?

The eBook reader stuff is another example of Apple mimicking real life objects unnecessarily. Creating a “library” page that looks like a real bookshelf and a book interface that visually resembles a book does not make this “easier to use” or “nicer.” It makes it unprofessional looking, actually. Childish.

And here’s some from the my own archives:

Tweet of the Day – Sour Grapes Edition

“Scaled Up Phone UI”

Thurrott on 2 Million Windows Phones

Paul Thurrott and Microsoft’s 2011 “Year of the Tablet”

And here’s some from Daniel Eran Dilger:

WWDC Secrets Paul Thurrott Hopes You Miss

Dan Lyons, Paul Thurrott: the Fake and the Phony

Paul Thurrott’s Merciless Attack on Artie MacStrawman

And here’s some from John Gruber:

Paul Thurrott: ‘Understanding iPad’

Paul Thurrott’s Curiously Shifting Thoughts on Copy-and-Paste

iPod Mania

I could go on.

Comments Off | tech

Paul Thurrott and Microsoft’s 2011 “Year of the Tablet”

January 3rd, 2011 — 12:39pm

Paul Thurrott writes:

This week at the annual Consumer Electronics Show (CES) in Las Vegas, Microsoft CEO Steve Ballmer will take the stage for a keynote address in which he will largely focus on tablet-based computers that are based on Windows and aimed largely at stemming the success of Apple’s iPad. If that seems like déjà vu to you, you’re not alone. Ballmer did exactly the same thing at last year’s CES keynote as well.

To massive laughter….

 

The difference, of course, is that PC makers will ship dozens of iPad competitors in 2011, compared to just the flimsy smattering of alternatives that arrived in 2010.

Quality not quantity….

In fact, the only true iPad competitor that appeared in 2010 was the Samsung Galaxy tab, a 7-inch tablet that runs on Google’s Android OS and not on Windows.

Runs it poorly….

For Ballmer, this year’s CES keynote isn’t just a do-over, it’s a chance to reset the playing field and refute the growing sense that Microsoft just isn’t competitive in new markets anymore.

A growing sense based on past performance….

As such, his keynote is shrouded in mystery. Microsoft’s PR firm has denied any pre-show briefings, for the first time ever, and the company’s Windows division will not be on hand at the show to provide in-person meetings after the keynote. This too is unprecedented.

According to sources at and close to the software giant, Microsoft is expected to reveal its plans for a new version of Windows, optionally based on ARM chipsets, which will be used on a new generation of thin and highly mobile devices. These devices will physically resemble Apple’s iPad in many cases, will offer up to 10 hours of battery life, and will run a stripped down Window version.

If they’re running Windows anything they won’t be getting 10 hour battery life, not to mention the whole touch UI aspect. Microsoft doesn’t have anything like iOS. And by that I mean a mobile OS derived from pieces of a larger more mature desktop OS. Windows Phone 7 isn’t based off Windows 7, but is a complete new OS

Microsoft won’t have a new UI for these devices until Windows 8 ships in 2012, so it is relying on its partners to create new Windows 7-based UIs for these devices in 2011.

Because they’ve done such a bang-up job in the past….

And while this rumor hasn’t been confirmed, Ballmer will almost certainly show off this early Windows 8 UI at CES, which explains why the Windows team won’t be on hand at the show: The company wishes for its public demonstration during the keynote to stand on its own and for individual reporters and bloggers not to get mini-scoops by plying Microsoft employees for information.

“Don’t buy an iPad! Look what were doing 2 years from now!”

This strategy is in keeping with Windows division head Steven Sinofsky’s way of doing things, and maps nicely to the Windows 7 schedule as well. You may recall that Microsoft’s first Windows 7 revelation came in mid-2008 when it showed off the multi-touch interface for that OS. That was followed by a private beta in late 2008, a public beta in very early 2009, and the final release of Windows 7 in October 2009. Tracing the Windows 8 schedule back from its planned mid-2012 release, we get the first UI revelation at CES 2011 this week, a private beta in mid-2011, and a public beta in late 2011. It all makes sense. But it’s all just conjecture at this point. Conjecture that makes plenty of sense if you know how Sinofsky’s team works.

What Microsoft is fighting here isn’t so much the iPad of 2010, but rather the iPad of the future. Apple’s first iPad release is missing some very obvious key features, but the company will move quickly to fix that, as will a new generation of Android-based competitors.

Let’s skip ahead a few chapters. Apple will do stuff right (maybe not everything all at once, but a handful of features done really well and then build off a solid foundation) and Android Tablets will do a lot of stuff, but none of it with any design sense or polish.

Apple will release its 2010 iPad sales figures sometime this month, but if we assume a blockbuster holiday season, the company could have sold as many as 14 million of them. That’s a tiny percentage of the PC market….

A market that will become increasingly less relevant as time goes on. But given that Microsoft took it over it must still mean something.

….but the size of the tablet market is expected to grow dramatically as capabilities improve—up to 40 million units in 2011, for example—as cost goes down, and as the competitive ranks expands. Microsoft intends to be part of that competition and do to the tablet market what it did to the netbook market: Seize control from the initial dominant player and turn it into part of Windows-oriented PC world.

In a dream world. Netbooks where always nothing more than cheap laptops. When people saw them they saw just another laptop and carried with them all the preconceptions they had grown up with (“where’s the start button?” and “the blue ‘e’ is the Internet!”). Tablets (at least a year ago) carried none of this pre-conceptions. The problem for Google and Microsoft is that Apple took “the tablet space” and turned it into “the iPad space”. “iPad” has become like “iPod”; a word that people use as short hand to describe a much larger market.

This strategy isn’t far-fetched, and while many—myself included—feel that the software giant is moving too slowly, the truth is that it could in fact catch up with and even surpass Apple and the Android camp. On the other hand, there are factors that make the tablet market quite different from that of the netbook market. And the biggest difference is apps: Both the iPad and Android are serviced by tens of thousands of proprietary apps that enhance the value of those platforms and engender a form of lock-in to the users who have already spent time and money downloading and paying for those apps. Switching to an alternative would require them to give up those apps. And that may prove to be problematic for existing customers.

Which, others will note, doesn’t really matter. Even if Apple had a blockbuster year for the iPad in 2010, there currently are less than 15 million tablets out there in the world right now. And if you accept the fact that this market is only going to grow, that means that the majority of tablet users a year or two from now won’t have app lock-in to worry about, as they’re effectively new customers.

New iPad customers….

But Microsoft will need to support its tablet products with app stores of their own, much as it does for its Windows Phone smart phone platform. And a version of the Windows Phone Marketplace aimed at these new devices is the logical place to start. Will Microsoft announce such a thing at CES? It’s something to look for. If they don’t, their new Windows version, and the tablet market that will spring up around it, could be stillborn.

Yep.

So there’s a lot to look for at this year’s CES, from a Microsoft perspective. There will be some Windows 7 and Windows Phone 7 momentum, but also looks to the future for both platforms in the form of Windows 8 (on PCs) and the slew of functional and bug fix updates that the company desperately needs to ship for its smart phone platform. I expect to hear about a new Windows version that will run on both ARM and Intel-type hardware, enabling true iPad alternatives from the Microsoft camp.

Anything running a desktop won’t be an iPad anything….it’ll be a rehash of a decade old failed strategy to show horn Windows into everything Microsoft can find.

The company will talk up its video game advances, particularly the Kinect, and should explain how getting a Kinect now is actually an investment, since the device will work with Windows in the near future as well.

Again….trying to make a desktop OS more relevant than working on a decent mobile strategy…..

Make or break? Not quite. But in a tech industry where perception often trumps reality, Microsoft needs to fight back. I expect an aggressive CES presence. Anything less and we’ll be dealing with “Microsoft is dead” stories for the rest of the year.

You can bet on it.

Comment » | tech

The iPad Mini – Problems and Issues

August 11th, 2010 — 7:57pm

UPDATE:  I’ve since recanted on the idea of an iPad Mini

“iPad Mini Mea-Culpa”

But I’m leaving the articles live as a record and historical curiosity.

————————————————————-

In the last two articles on the iPad Mini I covered how Apple will grow and refine the iOS platform and how Apple was going to make a more aggressive push against the dedicated e-book reader market with it’s multi-functional iOS iPad Mini.

iPad Mini – Setting the Stage

iPad Mini – Apple’s Real E-Book Reader Killer

In this article I’ll be looking at some of problems facing the iPad Mini.

Selling Like Hotcakes

The first issue when considering the iPad Mini is the fact that Apple is selling iPad’s hands over fist at the moment, and this is before the holiday rush.  I remember stating excitedly when the iPad was announced that it would sell more than the iPhone.  That didn’t quite pan out but I wasn’t surprised to see it almost outselling the Mac.  There’s not a lot of current reason for Apple to dull the still fresh excitement over the iPad and dilute the focus the company has on it.

When?

When Apple introduces a new iOS device of a certain screen size it gives developers a few months heads up to rewrite their apps to take advantage of the new screen size.  If Apple where to release a new screen size for the iPad it would have to pre announce it ala the iPhone SDK in March of 2008 and the iPad in January 2010.

When would Apple announce the iPad Mini and release the SDK?  Apple already has a full calendar of events with it’s current lineup of iOS products:

  • January – iPad announcement and new SDK
  • April – iPad released and iOS 4 announcement
  • June – WWDC and announcement of iPhone 4
  • July – iPhone 4 released
  • September – New iPods announced
  • October/November – iOS 4 for iPad announcement

There are two scenarios I can see:

  1. Apple announces the iPad Mini in January 2011 along with iPad 2.0 and announces the SDK for the iPad Mini.  This scenario works if Apple considers the iPad Mini in the same league as the iPad and demand has evened out.
  2. Apple announce the iPad Mini in the fall of 2011 at the iPod event.  This would tell us that the iPad Mini is more closely aligned with the iPod family.  This scenario seems less likely though as Apple wouldn’t tie the iPad Mini to the declining product line of the iPod.

App Store Fragmentation

Apple doesn’t make it’s money off the App Store, rather the App Store is simply there to make iOS devices more appealing to costumers.  It’s in their interest to keep the App Store running as smoothly and efficiently as possible.  This year has already introduced several fragmentations of the App Store:

  • iPad – new display size and more complex apps
  • iPhone 2G – not supported under iOS 4
  • iPhone 3G -  runs iOS 4, but doesn’t support multi-tasking
  • iPhone 4/Upcoming iPod Touch – introduces the Retina Display and Accelerometer

UI

Apple would have to rethink the basic user interface of the apps the iPad Mini would run.   Although the springboard for an iPad Mini would be identical to the iPhone/iPad, the apps themselves have special features specifically tailored to the screen size they’re running on.

Consider the iOS Mail App:

On the iPhone the UI consisted of a long list of emails which you tap and then the UI slides over to reveal the message.  Then the user would have to tap a back arrow and slide back to the inbox.  This “sliding” UI is a constant in both Apple’s iPhone apps and 3rd Party Apps because of the 3.5″ screen

The iPad and it’s 9.7″ screen introduced both the idea of a “2/3 screen” UI when held horizontal, and the popover menu when held vertically.

A 7″ iPad, having a screen size 3.5 inches bigger than an iPhone and 2.7 inches smaller than an iPad, would sit in between two user interfaces specifically designed for two different screen sizes. (My current hunch is that it would be easier to shrink down the 9.7″ UI because of the predominance of “empty space” present in a lot of the iPad apps.)

The Keyboard

Apple introduced it’s virtual keyboard with the original iPhone with predictive text, auto correcting and the “spyglass” UI for moving around the cursor.  These features made virtual keyboards a useable and desirable feature for a phone for the first time and was so successful that most modern smart phones have ditched the physical keyboard. In practice most iPhone users usually type either with the thumb of the hand holding the phone or with two thumbs at the same time.

Apple took this technology and applied it to the iPad which when held in landscape mode features a touch based keyboard almost the same size as a MacBook.  While few (thus far) has been able to type on an iPad with the same speed as a MacBook, the large keys allow for multi-finger typing and greater speeds.  (I did a little experiment where I tried to type with all 10 fingers without looking and as able to get about 80% accuracy)  When held vertical the iPad feels very much like a big iPod Touch, but most people have trouble using 10 fingers like a MacBook or with one or two thumbs like the iPhone.

The iPad Mini would have a keyboard that sits in between thumb typing portability and close-enough full productivity.  (The iPad Mini would most likely be more usable in 2 thumb vertical typing mode given it’s size.)

Differentiation

Apple likes to make product lines with with very clear differences in them.  This way it’s easy for a customer looking at iPods or Macs to very clearly find the product that best fits their needs.

Apple had to have several different sized version of the iPad for internal testing and finally settled on the 9.7″ screen.  One analogy would be that the iPod Touch is the 13″ MacBook of the iOS line (the smallest screen with the lowest price) while the iPad is the 17″ MacBook Pro(the biggest screen at the highest price).  There is a clear difference in the size, weight, screen size and the type of software you can run between the two devices.  Apple will have to decide (and probably has already decided) if their is room for a middle sized device in the iOS line.

Time will tell.

Comment » | tech

iPad Mini – Setting the Stage

August 7th, 2010 — 2:17pm

UPDATE:  I’ve since recanted on the idea of an iPad Mini

“iPad Mini Mea-Culpa”

But I’m leaving the articles up as a record and historical curiosity.

————————————————————-

Much has been made recently about Apple making a 7 inch version of it’s popular iPad as reported by iLounge.  But does it make sense for Apple to introduce a smaller version of the iPad?  I argue that it does.  Here’s why.

The iOS Boom

Looking at the past 4 years of Apple’s revenue it’s clear that the iPhone/iPod Touch have become a major driver in Apple’s financial health. At last figure Apple was making 40% of it’s money from the iPhone/iPod Touch, and that was before the iPad was on sale. A cursory glance at the revenue breakdown chart indicates that Apple has a major hit on it’s hand with the iPad, and that before the holiday season hits

Apple had moved into the iOS device business in a big way offering a mobile phone, a pocketable computer, and now a slate all running iOS. At the 2010 WWDC Jobs said Apple was on track to sell it’s 100 millionth iOS device within a month. iOS devices have given Apple a market penetration they could have only dreamed off in it’s traditional line of Mac OS X computers. (Apple’s last quarterly results had Apple selling 3.47 millions OS X devices vs 11.67 million iPhones/iPads)(iPod Touches where included in the iPod numbers and thus not broken out)

The Refinement of the iOS Platform

Current rumors are that the iPod Touch will be getting the iPhone 4 treatment of Retina Display, A4 processor, and front and rear facing cameras. The iPod Touch will also probably get a re-design to incorporate these features and I wouldn’t be surprised to see a flat double glass slate ala the iPhone 4.

The iPad will be getting iOS 4 sometime this fall. This will bring multi-tasking, unified inbox and folders and probably a few iPad only features such as wireless printing (most likely using Apple’s Bonjour technology) The next generation of the iPad will probably get a bumped processor speed (still ARM based), a slight bump in display pixels (Retina Display is just too cost prohibitive in a 9.7″ screen size) and front and back facing cameras.

This updates would bring the iPhone, iPod Touch and iPad into alignment feature wise providing a solid and consistent platform for developers to target. It would also mean that iPhones/iPod Touches/iPads would be updated simultaneously instead of the current situation of having both iOS 4 and iPhone OS 3.2.1.

The Future of iOS Devices

So the question becomes what can Apple do to grow the iOS platform. iOS 5 will bring in some software features. (Such as expanded multi-tasking ala periodic app pinging which would allow twitter and newsreader apps to check for updates much like Mail does now and improved notifications system)

Diversifying the Line

I argue that much like the Mac and the iPod before it Apple will diversify the iOS product line in order to cater to different use cases, all the while maintaining a consistent and easy to follow pricing and use case structure. A quick glance at the iPhone Apple Store App show the restraint Apple has with it’s product line, boiling down it’s entire business to 4 classes of products. (Andy Ihnatko described it as Apple telling a story with each product being a clearly defined role)

The Mac and iPod line have some further subcategories.

Looking at the mac line line it’s easy to tell the differences and use cases for each product.  Once the choice of desktop vs. laptop is made it’s easy for consumers to find the computer that closest fits their personal use case.

The same is true of the iPod line.

Let’s break out the iOS product line (Odd how the iPod Touch straddles both iPod and iOS device lines. Much hunch is that’s simply because the iOS product family is still too small. I wouldn’t’ be surprised to see Apple to make a more aggressive move to put the iPod Touch into the IOS family in it’s marketing and descriptions)

In the next article I’ll look at what Apple has planned for the iPad Mini and what the probable specs would be.

Comment » | tech

Back to top